ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the indications and clinical effect of the low-big hole choledochoduodenostomy. Methods Two hundred and ninty-eight patients, had bile duct stone accompanied with common bile duct lower segment stenosis, were prospectively enrolled into the study and randomly divided into the low-big hole choledochoduodenostomy (improved CD ) group (n = 148 ) and the Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (CJ) group (n = 150). Their perioperative period and long term effect indices were recorded and compared. Results Perioperative period indices:The time of cholangio-jejunostomy was much shorter in improved CD group than the CJ group ([31.0±10.5] min vs [53.0±12.3] min, P＜0.001);The anastomotic leakage was significantly less in improved CD group than the CJ group (2 vs 9, P ＜ 0. 001 ). The long term effect indices: The occurrence of peptic ulcer (3 vs 15 ) and the bile duct cecum or blind loop syndrome (5 vs 158) were significantly lower in group improved CD group than CJ group (Ps＜0.01);The occurrence of bile duct backflow (70 vs 42) was significantly higher in improved CD group than CJ group (P＜0. 0l). Conclusion The clinical effect of the low-big hole choledochoduodenostomy gastrointestinal had excellent effect for bile duct stone accompanied with common bile duct lower segment stenosis, especially for old,weak and critical patients,and it can not be replaced by the Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of the wound isolation in prevention of abdominal wound infection. Methods 2549 patients who bearded abdominal operation in 3 years in our hospital were randomly divid-ed into wound isolation group (n=1300) and control group(n=1249). The wound infection rates were summarized by operation ways and major influencing factors. Results The overall wound infection rate of control group and wound isolation group was 5.9% (76/1300) and 2.6% (32/1249). The infection rate was 13.4% (40/300) and 3.1% (9/280) in gallbladder resection, 14.7 % (24/165) and 3.5 % (6/159) in radical operation for carcinoma of colon, 13.6% (15/108) and 3.2% (13/114) in intestine block operation, 9.6% (18/187) and 1.8% (3/169) in stomach resection (P<0.01);The infection rate was 9.3% (13/145)and 2.9% (4/153)in biliary exploration, 14.6% (8/55) and 1.8% (1/56) in WHIPPLE, 10.6% (9/85) and 2.3% (2/88) in cholecystectomy (P<0.05);The infection rate was 6.3% (6/95) and 2.3% (2/86) in liver resection, 5.3% (5/95) and 1.2% (1/87) in spleen resection, 4.6% (3/65) and 1.8% (1/57) in porto-azygos venous disconnection (P>0.05). The wound infection rate of type Ⅰ resection of control group and wound isolation group was 2.0% (6/305) and 1.4% (4/280) (P> 0.05);The infection rate of type Ⅱ and Ⅲ resection was 7.0% (70/995) and 2.9% (28/969), for old man (≥60) was 12.6% (36/286) and 3.6% (10/279), the emergency operation was 10.0% (38/381) and 2.8% (10/362), the operation time ≥3 h was 9.0% (39/435) and 2.8% (12/426), with diabetes was 14.5% (21/145) and 4.9% (6/123), with obesity was 12.3% (40/325) and 3.9% (12/310), with malnutrition was 8.5% (39/458) and 3.2% (14/433), with cancer was 8.6% (40/465) and 3.0% (15/496) (P<0.01).;undergoing unemergency operation was 4.1% (38/919) and 2.5% (22/887),for yong persons (<60) was 3.9% (40/1014) and 2.3% (22/970), with operation time<3 h was (37/865) and 2.4% (20/823), without diabetes was 3.9% (45/1155) and 2.3 % (26/1126), without obesity was 3.7 % (36/975) and 2.1% (20/939), without malnutrition was 4.4% (37/842) and 2.2% (18/816)and without cancer was 4.3% (36/835) and 2.3% (17/753) (P<0.05). Conclu-sions The wound isolation can decrease the wound infection rates by reducing the chance of bacterial contamina-tion.